049 Billion In Damages As Jury Finds Samsung Infringed On Design And Software Patents
Here a quick rundown of how the jury came down on both of the companies. coque samsung Remember, there are plenty of devices at play here on Samsung side alone, there the Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S, Exhibit, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Nexus S 4G, Gem, Galaxy Tab, Galaxy Tab 10.1, Replenish, Vibrant, plus every carrier version of the Galaxy S II.On the patent, relating to one finger to scroll, two to pinch and zoom navigation, all but three Samsung devices (Ace, Intercept and Replenish) infringed.For Apple patent (tap to zoom) all Samsung devices except Captivate, Indulge, Intercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform and Vibrant infringed. coque iphone arms infringe: yes for the back patent on all devices, yes for finger scrolling for all devices except Replenish and yes for to zoom for all exceptCaptivate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Nexus S 4G.One of the biggest questions answered by the jury was if Samsung was willful in its infringement, which is where the major damages came into play. pokemon peluche The largest damages came from theprepaid Galaxy Prevail (over $57 million).The jury originally awarded Apple$1,051,855,000 coque iphone 7 s in damages, butJudge Kohsent the jurors back to deliberateover two discrepancies that resulted in Apple being awarded $2.20 million in damages. Apple argued that based on the nuanced coque iphone 5 en 3d language of the jurors instructions, coque iphone 6 chanel vernis both decisions should be allowed to stand. coque huawei coque samsung a5 juventus The jurors overturned their previous answer to coque iphone 5 s ferrari question 4 regarding the915 coque iphone se smiley patent and the Intercept device. coque iphone avec rose The site de coque iphone 7 changed ruling for two devices saves Samsung $2.2 million in damages.The dense trial involved more than a dozen different patents, over 30 allegedly infringing devices and wide ranging claims on design ownership; both sides argued their cases and defended themselves concurrently, all whileenraging federal judge Lucy Koh.Apple began with a full fledged assault, hurling numerous trademark claims, design and technical patent claims and more; after judge Koh ordered Apple to pare it down, the company has focused on a few key patents, the simplicity of its design and working to prove a pattern of copying by Samsung. goed hoesje Apple total monetary coque iphone 8 plus kawaii demand was$2.525 billion.Meanwhile, Samsung claimed that Apple iPhone and iPad were infringement and demanded $14.40 per device sold.The coque chantier samsung a5 2017 decision coque iphone 7 jeu logo comes with large ranging implications, as it sets precedent for coque iphone 7 plus voyage future patent law cases and will inevitably bring more lawsuits. Apple is already locked in a legal coque iphone bulle coque rigide samsung a5 2016 battle with HTC and could go after others.The verdict came in shockingly quickly, as coque iphone 6 spider man the jury was only in deliberation for three days. The jury worked one hour late yesterday and reached a decision at 2:35 PT today. Over 700 individual decisions had to be made by members of the jury, which does not come from particularly technical backgrounds, on their complex worksheets.It has been expected since the beginning of this trial that both companies would file appeals coque iphone 4s compatible iphone 5s regardless of the verdict, so it would be shortsighted to assume that this is the end. coque samsung Both companies are now discussing post trial motions and arguing over how much time Samsung should be given to coque iphone real madrid prepare.Here are coque iphone 5 silicone turquoise the statements from both companies.First, Apple PR head Katie Cotton:We are coque fantaisie samsung a5 2017 grateful to the jury for their service and for investing the time to listen to our story and we were thrilled to be able to finally tell it. bijoux pas cher The mountain of evidence presented during the trail showed that Samsung’s copying coque samsung a5 2017 paris went far deeper than even coque iphone lilas we knew. coque huawei coque huawei The lawsuits between Apple and Samsung were about much more than patents or money. They were about values. At Apple, we value originality and innovation and pour our lives into making coque iphone 11 blanc the best products on earth. We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy. We applaud the court for finding Samsung’s behavior willful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn’t right.”Today’s verdict should not be viewed as coque recto verso samsung galaxy a5 2017 a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer. It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and coque iphone 5s française potentially higher prices. It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies. Consumers have the right to choices, and they know what they are buying when they purchase Samsung products. coque huawei coque huawei This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims.